Circular Reasoning( Fractions)

.99.. vs 1 a Real Problem

 Circular Reasoning( Fractions).This kind of proof for 0.99... = 1 tries to show that a = b by starting with the assumption that a/n = b/n. Essentially, it assumes( no proof)  a/n = b/n, multiplies both sides by n, and then cancels n to conclude that a = b.

For example 1/3=.33...   => 1/3*3=.33...* 3 => 1 = .99...

Interestingly, many who present this proof acknowledge its flaws but still claim it as a good proof because it often convinces people.

You can see that most people accept the algebraic proof  below as fact, as evidenced by a simple google search and the overwhelming citations in 'The Naked Emperor' playlist. However, mathematically, this proof has no merit ( as apparent below )  and is just an illusion to believe. Many people stop at this point and delve no further, making it inherently impossible to explain the more complex topic.

The above screenshot shows an argument by mathematicians who believe 0.999…=1, yet they acknowledge that this proof is not correct. For this reason and many others, no serious mathematicians accept this as proof. (No further discussion seems necessary to debunk this type of proof).

Server IP: 10.70.0.254

Request IP: 5.75.150.64