Chormo Number Theory
Regarding quantum mechanics, I’m no expert and haven’t delved deeply into it. That said, I believe that many of the nonsensical claims in quantum mechanics stem from misunderstood mathematics and misuse of mathematical concepts (it’s like having a faulty program that gives nonsensical results when you input numbers). I have an intuition about why these claims are incorrect and am more focused on other problems, such as the Riemann Hypothesis. I believe I have the ability to address at least some aspects of quantum physics.
In other words, I think the definition of real numbers might be central to the oddities observed in quantum mechanics. I’ve created two superficial videos that explore errors in quantum mechanics through the lens of Riemann’s last theorem. I want to conclude by sharing that when I was in high school, I learned about quantum mechanics and believed that everything is quantized. The only thing that seems not to be quantized is the definition of real numbers. If everything is quantized, it seems illogical to define one thing( real number) differently from everything else.
Definition and correct answer are not proof , if I define 1 as 2 and then claim that 2 equals 1, I could argue that since their sum is 3=3, which is a true statement, 1 must equal 2. This kind of reasoning might be analogous to what I see in quantum physics. I intentionally avoided discussing chromo number theory because exploring that would take me a decade if I were to pursue it thoroughly.
When I have the Riemann Hypothesis proof settled, I will have spare time to explore this further. Again, I want to emphasize that the weirdness in quantum physics seems to stem from mathematical issues. Consider what I said above from a quantum perspective and keep an eye on Tao’s progress on the Twin Prime Number Proof. Obviously, I don’t want to reveal too much about potential discoveries, but I hope this gives you enough of a clue.
https://youtu.be/Hi4quO55G-M?si=mksP40XrhytZcHrc